US businesses operated in Viet Nam during 1865–1954, enabled by French invasion violence, but the US public is oblivious to that. For, US leaders falsely claim that the US entered Viet Nam in 1954 to fight nobly against communism. That false claim misleads the US public into falsely supporting the pursuit of resource control against other countries into 2024.

That is the source of much of the world’s conflict.

The author’s first book, Corporate Tsunami in Countryside Paradise : 1875–1900 Origin of US War in Viet Nam, describes the early US period in detail, and shows it is connected to today.

Scheduled for publication in Autumn 2024 is the second book in this series: Foreign policy false nucleus into 2024, from 1865–1954 US in Viet Nam. This second book shows how the false claim that hides the early period is at the nucleus of US foreign policy today.

The false claim misleads the US public to think the US entered Viet Nam in 1954 for a noble purpose to fight communism. Thus, much of the public thinks foreign policy must have continued to follow a noble purpose, such as to fight terrorism. In reality, the US war in Viet Nam was an attack attempting to continue the early, hidden business that had been enabled by force. That kind of purpose did not change after that war. It has continued in Palestine, Ukraine, Thailand, Africa, and other areas.

US leaders issued a 1943 report calling for the West to attack Viet Nam to keep it in “Colonial Relationships.” But Viet Nam defeated the French in 1954. US leaders quickly attacked. They killed “large numbers” by early 1955—a State Dept telegram says. So, attacking to keep the “Colonial Relationship” of the early business was the real reason for the US-Viet Nam war during 1954–75.

Into 2024, about 150,000 children (2021 estimate) are living with birth defects caused by Agent Orange/dioxin/poison sprayed during 1961–71 under orders by US civilian leaders. But in 1959, the US proved that dioxin kills or causes severe internal disease of a kind known to have killed as early as in 1935. What will US voters do about this information on children?